Which Epic feature would typically be audited to track who accessed patient data and what actions they performed?

Which Epic feature would typically be audited to track who accessed patient data and what actions they performed?

• A. Access Log
• B. User Activity Journal
• C. Security Audit
• D. Audit Trail

Answer: (D)

Auditing who accessed patient data and what actions they performed hinges on keeping a complete, event-level record of activity. In Epic, the Audit Trail is the feature built for this purpose. It captures each event with who did it, when it happened, which patient record or data was involved, and what action was taken. This detailed, chronological log supports accountability, security investigations, and regulatory compliance by letting you reconstruct exactly what occurred and when it occurred. Other options may track certain aspects—like login attempts or general user actions—but they don’t provide the comprehensive, specific audit record that ties a user to particular data access and operations. The broader term Security Audit refers to overall security checks rather than the precise, actionable log of data access events.

Auditing who accessed patient data and what actions they performed hinges on keeping a complete, event-level record of activity. In Epic, the Audit Trail is the feature built for this purpose. It captures each event with who did it, when it happened, which patient record or data was involved, and what action was taken. This detailed, chronological log supports accountability, security investigations, and regulatory compliance by letting you reconstruct exactly what occurred and when it occurred. Other options may track certain aspects—like login attempts or general user actions—but they don’t provide the comprehensive, specific audit record that ties a user to particular data access and operations. The broader term Security Audit refers to overall security checks rather than the precise, actionable log of data access events.